Using AI is... interesting. As it gets better it gets increasing more compelling to use. And this is especially true as a software developer. Or at least it is true for me and I suspect that the reasons are similar. I like writing code. But what I like more is solving problems and creating something new. AI gets me there faster. With enough guidance, it even writes the code in a very similar fashion. Add in a thorough code review and I don't even feel bad about it. Make sure that I or the AI write some meaningful tests and there is very little to complain about. I get the bigger dopamine hit and I get it faster, which means I can get it more often. AI usage is effectively a drug for the developers who crave the results over the process. The problem eventually becomes employability. Over time you stop using the skills and lose them or they become rusty. Interviews are becoming a real eye opener for me. It isn't even that I feel I've lost the skills. I likely am worse than I...
A bit late on the retrospective but, I took a look at the video submitted for my 2-Dan shinsa and wanted to reflect a bit. Honestly, I think 50/50 or worse odds to pass. In a lot of ways, there was noticeable progress over my shodan testing. But the areas where it fell apart are the areas where the 2-Dan criteria does draw some specific attention. Here is what the IKYF Shinsa Regulation say about 2-Dan: Both the shooting form (Shakei) and formal movement (Taihai) should have good arrangement with evidence of spiritual energy (Kiryoku) in the application of the shooting technique (Shajitsu). There should be less uncertainty in the placing of the arrows (Yadokoro). The biggest things I think will hurt me are: Over shooting my walk up to SHAI Going over 3 minutes Pacing/Spiritual Energy Adjusting bow upward in KAI Shoulder up in UCHIOKOSHI Things which are improved: Aside from KAI, less wasted movement overall Achieved good amounts of YUGAERI on both arrows (full on HAYA) Both arrows para...