Skip to main content

Alberta Pulling out of CPP thoughts

I think the idea here is simply to be polarizing. Then again, maybe the Premiere of Alberta is actually an idiot.

Let's start with the simple; creating a separate Provincial CPP replacement is a gamble. Period. The strength of CPP comes from the size of the pool, both in terms of money and participants. Yes, an aging population hurts. But it hurts more slowly with a larger pool of people. Alberta's population will eventually age as well. Their birth rate is lower than 2 and changes like this make it immigration a harder sell which is how most Provinces are currently offsetting aging populations. With a smaller pool of contributors this shift will hit harder and faster.

The other problem is the "ask". The claim that Alberta is owed more than 53% of the pool is absurd. That number is an inaccurate fantasy. There is quite literally no way it represents the actual, relative contributions of Albertans to the fund. 

Some quick Googling yields the following results:

  • Canada's population = 38.25m
  • Canada's avg wage = $59 300
  • Quebec's population = 8.7m
  • Alberta's population = 4.7m
  • Alberta's avg wage = $75 354
We don't need to be super accurate here because the difference won't be anywhere near 53% but we do need to remove Quebec because they don't participate in CPP and constitute a large portion of the population.

So, Canada - Quebec = 29.55m people. The average age was within spitting difference for all provinces so we'll just use this to compare rough contributions.

Of that, Alberta represents about 16%. And, Alberta's wages are about 27% higher than the rest of the country on average. Let's round it up to 30% because Alberta is included in that average as well.

And then scale up their 16% by 30% gives us about 21%. Notice how that number is NOWHERE NEAR 53%?

While the actual math is complicated, I will point out; I've been super generous by simply multiplying their population by their wage gap. Why? Well, since Albertan's are typically higher earners, and CPP amounts are based on income amount, their payouts from CPP are also higher on average. Which means that per person. And, given that the average age isn't markedly lower, this means that they are proportionately taking that money back out at the same rate. 

Realistically, the original 16% is probably still closer to the truth of a fair amount. I simply added the wage difference to the mix to show how far from reality that 53% number is. And to top it all off, I haven't heard anything to imply that there is any exit clause in CPP. So, they are likely at the mercy of the other participants in the pool for getting ANY money on the way out the door.

Now, I imagine that there will some good faith should this ever get to negotiations. Other Provinces may have considered this in the past or may be considering it now that a decent chunk of income is leaving the pool and they would like to set a reasonable precedence. Ultimately however, Alberta's best case scenario is to leave with a pool of money to leave it in a similar position as CPP. So, if there are benefits longer term it will only come from the gamble paying off. Short term the fund will simply be smaller and less diversified and thus at greater risk.

It COULD work out for Alberta. But I doubt it will. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Kyudo Blog #2 - Shinsa Prep

So, we're well past my first year. I decided to take the video shinsa for shodan at the end of the year. We also, have a new cohort joining the dojo. Things are getting interesting. This journey has not been at all what I expected. First, I had expected Kyudo to be both more and less introspective. Our dojo focuses more on Taihai, or the ceremonial/performance aspect of the art. And that comes with a lot of concern for harmony and beauty as a group. Making movements up to shai (firing line) in unison as much as possible.  At the same time the focus on the self is infinitely more than I could have anticipated as well. Posture, breathing, form and movements. Everything seems to have a right way of doing it. And none of those "right ways" come naturally. Beyond that there is also etiquette. Even things you might not associate with the practice itself are a part it. And all of these things then also need to be in harmony with everything else. Needless to say, I have a long wa...
Post a Comment
Read more

WoT Getting Picked Up By Another Network?

A lot of people are hoping that, since the cancellation, WoT will be picked up by another network. I don't think it will happen. I didn't mind the show and while I have some beef with it, even the quality of the show isn't the reason I don't believe it will be picked up again. This could have been the best received series of all time and no one would touch it now. Why? Because it is an unknown factor now. Basically, WoT is a show based on an existing IP with an existing fanbase. What was completed of the existing TV Series drifted so far from the books that it alienated that fanbase. This is a problem because there is no built-in audience for what comes next. The book fans have no reason to come along because the storyline from the books is no longer recoverable. And, even the TV show fans aren't a guarantee. In fact, they are especially not guaranteed here. Another unique factor here is that WoT was on Prime Video. This is a streaming service many people simply get...
Post a Comment
Read more

Alberta's Potential CPP Exit

I'll start with "bad idea" and "won't go as planned". What makes the Alberta plan so enticing is also why it will fail. Basically, a study concluded that Alberta could be entitled to as much as 53% of the funds assets. And IF that were paid out, then Alberta would be able to start it's own pension fund and pay out more for less. The problem is that they won't get that much, and they aren't realistically entitled to that much. To frame the problem better, under the most loose and beneficial interpretation, the same company ended up at a number which was 118% of the funds assets. That's right, the wording of the act is so flawed that it can create interpretations of it such that Alberta could be construed as being owed more funds than the pool has. Clearly. CLEARLY that is insane. Alberta's relative share of the contributions is 18% and their population is about 16% of the people's involved. But, if they only take 16-18% it is NOT a bet...
Post a Comment
Read more